By Grace Alone

One of the best Christian authors alive today is Dr Sinclair Ferguson, theologian and pastor in Columbia, SC. His books are full of clear, biblical and warm insights into Christian belief and Christian living. They are immensely helpful, and among the most useful in my ministry with others.

Ferguson’s newest book, BY GRACE ALONE, (which I’ve just started reading) appears to also have these qualities. While there is a sweet simplicity to the organization and much of the content of this book, some paragraphs plumb new depths of insight that have caused me to pause and catch my breath! As chapter three (describing the passion of Christ) draws to a close, this section was one such:

The two charges leveled against Jesus were blasphemy (that He had made Himself equal with God) and treason (that He had rejected lawfully constituted authority).

Why were those two charges so significant? It was because these are the charges each of us faces before the judgment seat of God.

In that court, I am guilty of blasphemy, because I have made myself rather than God the center of the universe.

I am also guilty of treason, since I have sought to overturn His lawfully and graciously constituted authority over my life.

Blasphemy and treason were also the crimes of Adam. These are the age-old crimes of which every one of us — old and young, rich and poor, wise and simple, famous and infamous — stands accused. We are on the same charge sheet. We are all guilty.

But Jesus has come!
[page 44]

Amazing grace to such sinners. Amen.

Tea Party Prevarication

Prevarication: to speak or act in an evasive way; origins in the Latin praevaricat– ‘walked crookedly, deviated.’ Here is a straight shot, employing great logic, with great consequences in a blog posting at Desiring God.

“Tea Party Prevarication” by John Piper

According to the New York Times “The Tea Party leaders . . . deliberately avoid discussion of issues like . . . abortion. . . . [They] argue that the country can ill afford the discussion about social issues when it is passing on enormous debts to future generations.”

Let me see if I understand this term “ill afford”.

Is this it? Enormous debt will hurt our children and grandchildren. Therefore don’t talk about the lawfulness of whether they can be killed.

Something like that?